# Physical space

According to comedian

Steven Wright,

**physical space** is the thing that
keeps everything from happening in the same place.

In everyday experience, physical space is characterized by being three dimensional and Euclidean. The former characteristic refers
to the fact that any point can be located by specifying three numbers. Alternatively, it means that any point can have three mutually perpendicular
lines extending from it. The latter characteristic refers to the fact that
distances follow the Pythagorean theorem and several equivalent characteristics such as the fact that the angles of a triangle sum to 180 degrees.

Although the physical space in everyday experience is structured this way,
there is no mathematical reason why this must be so. It is perfectly mathematically possible for space to have four or forty dimensions, meaning that one would need four or forty numbers to specify a point and that from
a given point there would be four or forty mutually perpendicular lines. Similarly there is no mathematical reason why the angles of triangles must some to 180 degrees or that the Pythagorean theorem must hold for actual points. Since the early-19th century, mathematicians have worked out in
great detail what how these alternate worlds would behave. Mathematically
speaking, the universe *could* act in these strange ways, but at the scales
that we are familar with, they don't.

This opens the question of whether space behaves differently for situations that
we aren't familiar with. To fit with our daily observations, physical theories must predict three dimensional Euclidean space for our everyday world. However it may be that our everyday observations may be an approximation for a more complex reality. Indeed, physics suggests that this is the case in several ways.

First of all, in our everyday observations, it appears that space and time
are separate. It also appears that distance is an invariant. Suppose you
have a box and you label each of the points of the box with different
(x, y, z) coordinates. You can choose what numbers you use to describe the
box to be what ever you want provided that the distance between the points
Delta X ^ 2 + Delta Y ^ 2 + Delta Z ^2 remains constant.

Spacetime is the fabric in which everything happens and which everything has happened. Time and space are not just related, they are the same thing.
To describe spacetime, it's necessary to invoke an analogy.

Imagine you're an ant, an ant which has no perception of up or down. You can only move in a plane. If you set off along a straight line, you can do two things. You can walk forever, or you can end up where you started. If you end up where you started, the only explanation is a third dimension, that you're on the surface of a sphere. The third dimension is inaccessible to you, but it has to exist to explain your findings.

Spacetime may be one of these states. It can be open or closed. Open spacetime would have you walking forever. Closed spacetime would have you returning to where you started. However, the geometry works such that a closed spacetime can be closed, yet not "wrap around".
There is also a flat spacetime, which is a strange intermediate state.

The concept of a 'curved space' is logically flawed because space can only be defined by the distance between two objects, which is however by definition always given by a straight line. Mathematicians frequently try to illustrate the properties of 'curved space' through the example of a spherical (or otherwise curved) surface and the associated geometrical relationships.

However, a surface is only a mathematical abstraction within the actual space and one can in fact connect any two points on the surface of a physical object through a straight line by drilling through it.

Strictly speaking, one can not assign any properties at all to space (or time) as these are the outer forms of existence and it makes as much sense to speak of a 'curved space' as of a 'blue space'. Any such properties must be restricted to objects existing within space and time.

The concept of a distorted space around massive physical objects for instance, as promoted by general relativity, is therefore also inconsistent and should be replaced by appropriate physical theories describing the trajectories of particles and/or light near these objects.